Cisplatin-loaded superparamagnetic nanoparticles modified with PCL-PEG copolymers as a treatment of A549 lung cancer cells

Document Type: Original Research Article


1 Department of Medical Nanotechnology, faculty of Advanced Medical Science, Tabriz Medical University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of medical Sciences, Tabriz , Iran

3 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz , Iran

4 Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

5 Department of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, USA


Magnetic nanoparticles have been highly regarded because of their unique properties, such as hyperthermia, medicine control release, and diagnostic applications. The main aim of the current paper is to offer a new system for the modification of Fe3O4 (SPIONs) superparamagnetic nanoparticles physically and chemically with polymers through physical retention. These modified nanoparticles have been used to encapsulate cisplatin as an anticancer medicine and the effect of nanocapsulated cisplatin has been studied in lung cancer (A549) cell line. Using ring-opening polymerization Triblock copolymer PCL-PEG-PCL was prepared of ɛ-caprolactone (PCL) in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG). Magnetic iron nanoparticles were also prepared and identified. Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), the bulk features of the copolymers were determined. Nanoparticles loaded with Cisplatin have been ready using the copolymer containing iron superparamagnetic nanoparticles via double emulsion solvent evaporation method and evaluated for medicine entrapment efficiency (%), the quantity of medicine, size, and surface morphology. Cytotoxic tests have been considered using the MTT assay method in lung carcinoma (A549)-treated cells. The results of the study demonstrated that nanocapsulated cisplatin had a significant cytotoxic and anticancer effect in vitro of the lung cancer cell line and it can be concluded that this approach has the ability to fail some of the main chemotherapy constraints and can be an appropriate approach for future programs in the treatment of lung cancer.



Cancer is one of the most common diseases of death in developed and less developed countries (1). According to the American Cancer Society, in 2017, about 26% of all mortality from cancer is lung cancer (2). Even with the last advancement in cancer treatment, there is a teeny definite development in the treatment of lung cancer. Those who are most at risk of lung cancer are adults over the age of 50 years and those who have a history of smoking, or smoking or pipe and hookah (3). Although smoking is a major cause of lung cancer, people who have never smoked can also be exposed to lung cancer for reasons such as past pulmonary infections, and environmental and genetic factors. Those who do not smoke include 15% of cases of lung cancer. These are commonly found in exposure to asbestos, radioactive gas, genetic elements and air pollution(4). The most communal indications are including coughing up blood shortness of breath and weight loss(5). Typically, signs of lung cancer do not appear as long as the disease is in its advanced stages. Usually, signs of lung cancer do not appear as long as the disease is in its advanced stages, which is why lung cancer is not usually diagnosed at an early stage (6). The 5-year survival rate for valetudinarians with lung cancer is 16%, as most patients are diagnosed with advanced stage (7). The first diagnostic method for lung cancer is the chest radiograph. Chest radiography is able to show the presence of the tumor, lung collapse, widening of the mediastinum, inflammation of the pulmonary etc. In addition, CT scans are used to determine the type and stage of cancer (8). Lung carcinomas are classified as Small Cell Carcinoma (SCLC) and Non-Small Cell Carcinoma (NSCLC) (for example adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma)(9). Common treatments for lung cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. In the chemotherapy of lung cancer, platinum-based medicine (Cisplatin or Carboplatin) and Gentamicin, Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, etc. are commonly used (10). The common chemotherapy for SCLC is cisplatin or combination of Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Cyclophosphamide(11, 12). Chemotherapy as a basic treatment for lung cancer has poor results due to medicine resistance, so it is very important to make changes to these therapies using modern methods (13) Since the 1990s, new medicines have been developed and proposed for the treatment of lung cancer, yet cisplatin is still a major medicine for the treatment of lung cancer(14). Nanotechnology has been considered with the use of nanoparticles and the development of targeted medicine delivery methods for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. The use of nanocarriers for medicine delivery to cancerous tissues will reduce side effects and eliminate medicine resistance as well as further medicine sustainability(15). Today nanoparticles are widely used in medical and diagnostic studies. One of the nanoparticles that can be used to promote targeted medicine delivery to cancer cells is polycaprolactone (PCL), but there is a problem with the application of this polymer because the lack of electrical charge on the surface of these particles leads to be swallowed by Phagocytes (16). They also degrade very slowly because of hydrophobicity. Therefore, polyethyleneglycol (PEG) is used to overcome these problems. Poly ethylene glycol has a hydrophilic property and has a dramatic effect on the reduction of trapping by the body’s Reticulum Endothelial System (RES) and increased solubility(17, 18). Recent developments in nanotechnology have advanced ability to modify the structures and properties of Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) for biomedical applications. Moreover, Magnetic nanoparticles have a high potential in the recognition and treat the diseases, especially cancer. The use of these nanoparticles as contrast enhancing agents in the conventional method of magnetic resonance imaging and also as a nanocarriers in modern medicine delivery systems have been of interest to researchers over the past few years. Among the iron oxide nanoparticles, magnetic is the only Nanoparticle that approved for clinical use by the Food and Medicine Administration (FDA) (18-20). Magnetic nanoparticles are mainly used in therapeutic systems and diagnostic applications such as imaging, sensors, targeting, medicine delivery, hyperthermia, chemotherapy etc. (Fig. 1)
(19). Physical and chemical properties and appropriate size of these particles have made them suitable as contrast agents for use in cellular and molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease and MRI. In addition, using the induction excitation of biocompatible superparamagnetic nanoparticles and the fluctuations of magnetic moments within the nanoparticles can generate additional heat (41-47 °C) in the tumor area and thereby destroy the cancer cells, while not damaging healthy cells. As magnetic nanoparticles react to the external field, they are therefore have received much attention in the field of active targeting and drug delivery.

MNPs are a major category of nanoparticles with the capability to develop common clinical therapy and diagnostic procedures. While primary studies in this regard can be traced back to some decades, a new round of attention to nano-technology has meaningfully extended the scope and depth of MNPs studies (20). The encapsulation of anti-cancer medicines in triblock polymers that are biodegradable poly-(ethylene glycol)-poly (e-caprolactone)-poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG-PCL-PEG) nano-particles might show benefits over other delivery systems, such as liposomes (Fig. 2). Some of these benefits are well known in previous studies , for example, many of very hydrophobic to highly hydrophilic medicines can be encapsulated in PCL-PEG-PCL nanoparticles, the release rate can be specific to the size and loading and modification (21, 22). PEG is hydrophilic non-immunogenic and non-toxic. Since PCL is a biocompatible, biodegradable, semi-crystalline polymer with a low glass transition temperature, so the PEG-PCL nanoparticles are biocompatible and biodegradable that act as a micelle. The outer layer is made up of hydrophilic PEG and has furtiveness properties so (RES) cannot detect it. They have a longer circulation time in the bloodstream and more enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effects, which allows them to enter into the solid tumors. (23, 24).

Cisplatin or Cis-Platinum or Cis-Diamine Di-Chloro-Platinum (II) (CDDP) is a platinum-grounded chemotherapy medicine used to treat various types of cancers including sarcoma, some carcinomas (such as small-cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer ), Lymphomas and germ cell tumors are used(26, 27). While these agents have side effects that limit the dose level. Side effects of cisplatin embrace nausea, vomiting, peripheral neuropathy, ear toxicity, liver toxicity, increased blood urea, encephalopathy, nephrotoxicity, etc. (28). Due to the constraints in dosing cisplatin, several clinical prosecutions have been or being indicated to better lung cancer products using cisplatin in combining with other elements like gemcitabine 5-fluorouracil and purposeful treatments making small-molecule suppressors or monoclonal antibodies (29, 30). Other methods to improve cisplatin performance in vivo examined. Nano-particles and local delivery of medicine methods like chemotherapy-filled films, and gels are establishing to advance medicine approval along minimizing systemic complications (31). Indeed, nanoparticles loaded with cisplatin have been estimated in many clinical prosecutions coupled with favorable outcomes and other cisplatin medicine delivery materials like those that films, adhesives, and gels armed for topical prescription are becoming important in coping with lung-related thoracic cancers (32-36). In this report, we produce triblock poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (e-caprolactone)-poly (ethylene glycol) nanoparticles and have studied clinical value of them for the safe and performative transfer of the Cisplatin as an anti-cancer agent. Decreasing the nephrotoxicity induced by cisplatin is highly appropriate for curing lung cancer. Nano-technology offers a strong device for reducing the overall absorption of cisplatin in the kidneys with the absorption fraction of cisplatin among the kidneys and blood. So, new therapeutic methods and uncommon preparations of Cisplatin are to-the-point desired to advance the rate of handling in the patients with lung cancer a meager diagnosis.


Ferric chloride hexahydrate,
ferrous chloride tetrahydrate, and ammonium hydroxide (25 wt %) from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland), D, L-lactide, glycolide, dimethyl sulfoxide and Poly (ethylene glycol) (Mw=4000) from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO), Acryloyl chloride, stannous octoate, ℇ-caprolactone (ℇ-CL) (Mw=14000) from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) and Cisplatin from Merck have been purchased. Human lung carcinoma cell line  was purchased from Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran. X-ray diffraction, Rigaku D/MAX-2400 x-ray diffractometer with Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements were conducted using VEGA/TESCAN. The capacity to load medicine and its free behavior were specified with an ultra-violet visible 2550 spectrometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Infrared spectra were registered in real-time with a Perkin Elmer series FTIR. The magnetic feature was measured using magnetometer on a vibrating sample (Meghnatis Daghigh Kavir Co, Kashan, Iran) at room temperature. The average molecular weight was attained using gel permeation chromatography done in dichloromethane () with a Waters Associated Model ALC/gel permeation chromatography 244 device. The specimens have been homogenated with a homogenizer (Silent Crusher M, Heidolph Instruments GmbH, Schwabach, Germany). The organic phase has been evaporated by the rotary (Rotary Evaporators, Heidolph Instruments, and Hei-VAPseries).

Conditions for culturing of cancerous cell lines

The A549 cell line after distinguishing IC50 (1*10) cells have been treated with different concentrations of PCL-PEG-Cisplatin. For the control group, the same volume of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide without -PCL-PEG-Cisplatin have been added to the flask. Flasks were incubated at 37 containing 5% with an incubator having humidified atmosphere for 24-h exposure duration.

The synthesis method of Superparamagnetic nano-particles

Superparamagnetic nanoparticles have been synthesized by the help of an improved chemical co-precipitation procedure (37).

Based on this procedure 7.5684 g the exact value of (0.028 mol) and 3.1736 g of (0.016 mol), have been dissolved in 320mL of deionized water (30 minutes deoxygenation), resembling Fe2+/Fe3+ = 1/1.75. Then the mixture has been stirred under nitrogen at for 1 hour after a few minutes, 40 mL  have been added rapidly into the mixture, stirred under nitrogen for another hour (pH between 9.5 and 11). As soon as the is added, the yellow solution turns black which indicating the formation of magnetic nanoparticles. And then the solution cooled to room temperature. The resulting particles were washed several times and separated by the magnet. Finally, the magnetic nanoparticles were dried under vacuum at  (Fig. 3).

Preparation of PCL-PEG triblock copolymer

PCI-PEG--PCL triblock copolymer has been synthesized using PCL initiated PEG whit ring-opening polymerization method. A certain amount of PEG and PCL monomers with a ratio of 3 to 1 in a three-neck Round-Bottom Flask and nitrogen Presence in a bath of silicone oil on stirrer equipped with a heater, up to 180 ° C for 5 minutes, melted. Balloons on a heater with a magnetic stirrer were heated. For precise temperature control at all stages of a thermometer in the bath with constant and equal height from the bottom of the balloon was placed. After melting of the PEG, the temperature was increased 130. Then octoate molten tin catalyst (0/05% by weight of raw material) was added as a catalyst to start the Polymerization reaction polymerization at this temperature with gentle stirring and continued nitrogen gas flow. (In the early hours of Polymerization should completely prevent to entry oxygen gas into the balloon). After Polymerization, the solution was cooled to room temperature. Gross Polymer for purification and isolation of residual monomers, solid Polymer was dissolved in dichloromethane and was poured into a large volume of diethyl ether and dry. Diethyl ether as a solvent action and lead to the deposition polymer. This process was repeated twice. Polymer smoothing method of the solvent in a vacuum attached to the desiccating.

Preparing cisplatin-encapsulated Fe3O4 magnetic nano-particles modified using PCL-PEG copolymer

For the preparation of magnetic nano-particles PCL-PEG-loaded with cisplatin, double emulsion technique was used. 5mg of magnetic nanoparticles and 30mg cisplatin in 5 ml dichloromethane in which 300mg of PCL-PEG copolymer solved. Emulsion with sonicator probe with the power of 10W for 45 seconds have been sonicated. As a result, the primary emulsion W/O was prepared. Original emulsion stabilizers containing an aqueous solution (solution 1% PVA) with a volume of 10.6 ml was added and again with sonicator probe was homogenized in 18W for 60 seconds. Double emulsion W/O/W to obtain the highly agitated at room temperature so that the organic phase dichloromethane absolutely mixed (cause evaporation at the end) to increase medicine encapsulation, the suspension was lyophilized (Fig. 4). The content and the efficacy of encapsulation of Cisplatin in nano-particles corrected with PCL-PEG copolymer were disintegration nanoparticles in dichloromethane. The Cisplatin condensation was specified by spectrophotometry at 210-280nm. The efficacy of medicine encapsulation was measured using the equations below: (DEE%: Medicine Encapsulation Efficacy Percent) (38).



Characterization of nanoparticle morphology using SEM

The morphology of the magnetic nanoparticles and Cisplatin-encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles modified with PCL-PEG copolymer nanoparticles was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as an accelerating voltage of 10.0 kV (VEGA/TESCAN) and samples were coated with gold. The diameter of nanoparticles was determined by ImageJ software (20 nanoparticles were selected at random).

The study of in vitro medicine release

Examining the releasing of synthesized cisplatin encapsulated in nano-particles corrected with PCL-PEG copolymer, 3mg of medicine-Encapsulated nanoparticles were scattered in 30mL of phosphate-buffered solution (pH=7.4). The specimens were incubated at . At the dedicated time intervals, a 3mL specimen was taken out and the same volume was constituted again with the addition of 3mL of a fresh phosphate-buffered solution and acetate buffer to each specimen. After the test, the samples were analyzed with the help of ultraviolet spectrofluorometry to specify the value of Cisplatin released (210 nm and 265nm for Cisplatin measurement).

Cytotoxicity assays

The A549 lung cancer cell line was cultured in a RPMI-1640 (Gibco, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) culture medium containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)(Gibco, Invitrogen, UK), 0.05 mg/mL penicillin G (Serva Co, Germany), 2mg/mL sodium bicarbonate,0.08 mg/mL streptomycin (Merck Co, Darmstadt, Germany), and incubated at  and 5% humidity in sterile flasks. After several days the cell count reached  per ml. as soon as a sufficient number of cells were obtained the cytotoxic effect was studied at 24, 48, and 72 h using MTT assays. In short, 1000 cells/well were cultivated in a 96-well plate. at first 20 μl of the suspension containing 10 cells was added to each well from a 96-well plate, after 24 hours, 200 μl of the various dilutions prepared with the culture medium added to each well (each dilution was triple Used). Wells that only contained a cell-free medium were used as a blank of Elisa Reader. Cell-free wells without treat as controls, wells containing cells treated with -PCL-PEG-Cisplatin and wells containing treated cells with pure cisplatin were used. Different treatment times of 24, 48 and 72 hours for treatment of cells with different dilutions of the medicine were considered. After the treatment was complete, 200 μl of fresh medium and 50 μl of MTT solution were poured into each well. Finally, the environment of each well was evacuated and 200 μl DMSO and 25 μl Sorenson buffer were added to each well. To dissolve the formazan crystals the plates were shaken then the amount of optical absorption was read by the ELISA reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT) at 570nm with a reference wavelength of 630 nm. The following formula was used to convert OD to the percentage of live cells.


At the end, optical absorption was analyzed using SPSS 16 software. And IC50 of nanoparticles including -PCL-PEG-Cisplatin, blank and pure cisplatin were calculated at 24, 48 and 72 hours (Fig. 5).


A perfect preparation of biocompatible nano-sized particles leads to great medicine loading along sustained-release fractures, so letting medicine at a therapeutic concentration release in the targeted place and minimizing medicine inefficiency and confrontational impacts. Many methods have been investigated for this purpose(39, 40). In this study, we presented a new formulation of cisplatin that is less toxic and more effective than pure cisplatin. In this method for reducing unfavorable features of Cisplatin, we used super-paramagnetic nanoparticles modified with PCI-PEG--PCL triblock copolymer to encapsulate the Cisplatin anti-cancer medicine. These nanoparticles arranged and modified as a carrier that can be used for targeting to the wide range of solid tumors. For this purpose, the PCL-PEG-PCL triblock copolymer was synthesized by ring-opening polymerization methods using poly (ethylene glycol) and poly (ℇ-caprolactone) monomers. It was found that The FTIR spectra were in accordance with the PCL-PEG-PCL copolymer structure(41). The molecular weight has been determined using gel penetration chromatography. In this work, nanoparticles containing cisplatin were prepared by Double emulsion W/O/W method. The percentage of medicine entrapped in nanoparticles was determined 70% and the particle size was around 50-70nm. The results showed that the cisplatin-encapsulated nanoparticles exhibition pH sensitivity and can be used for targeting extra-cellular pH and could be an effective carrier for anti-cancer medicines. It is awaited that, the cisplatin encapsulated nanoparticles can show enhanced cytotoxicity at tumor pH, compared with normal pH=7.4. The Result shows that magnetic nanoparticles could be impressive as a carrier for medicine delivery. The in vitro cytotoxicity experiment showed that magnetic nanoparticles did not have the cytotoxic effect and were biologically compatible, to wit that there is potential for biomedical application. In addition, it was found that the IC50 of the nanocapsulated cisplatin in Fe3O4 modified with PCL-PEG-PCL copolymer on A549 cancerous cell line depends on time.

In vitro cytotoxicity

cytotoxicity assay (MTT assay) data analysis displayed that IC50 of Cisplatin-PCL-PEG- Fe3O4 on the A549 cancerous cell line is 15 g/ml, 8 g/ml, 2.5 g/ml respectively for 24, 48 and 72 (Table 1)

Following diagrams indicates that IC50 of Fe3O4-PCL-PEG-Cisplatin on A549 lung cancer cell line depends on time and dose. Additionally, as is shown in Fig. 3, IC50 for pure Cisplatin are 50 g/ml, 22 g/ml, and 8 g/ml respectively for 24, 48 and 72h exposure times (Fig. 6). Therefore, there is a need for further study in the future of this new formulation of cisplatin.

Characterization of synthesized Nanoparticles

To examine the crystal structure of the magnetic nanoparticles Powder X-ray diffraction (Rigaku D/MAX-2400 X-ray diffractometer with Ni-filtered Cu Ka radiation) was utilized. The size and shape of the nanoparticles were determined using SEM. The sample was solved in ethanol and a small drop was spread onto a 400 mesh copper grid. The infrared spectra were registered using FTIR spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer series, Waltham, MA), and the sample and KBr were pressed to form a tablet.

Diffraction patterns of X-ray

The crystalline structure of the synthesized magnetic nanoparticles was analyzed by XRD. The value of θ2 was considered in the range of 20 to 100. As expected, the diffraction pattern shows a cubic spinel structure for magnetite. Five peaks respectively 220, 311,400, 422, 511, 440, were determined which are consistent with the spectral lines presented in the references. In Fe3O4 nanoparticle crystals, the most severe reflection peak is 311, which determines the average size of crystals, using the ‘Debye–Scherrer equation (Dhkl = 0.9λ (β Cos θ)) nanoparticle size was found to be about 9 nm. In this formula, β represents half the width of the XRD diffraction and λ is equal to 0.154 nm and θ is equal to half the diffraction angle of θ2.

Nanoparticles Size and Size distribution (SEM)

The surface morphology of the nanoparticles was recorded using SEM. The graph of pure nanoparticles (Fig. 7.a) and Cisplatin-encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles modified with PCL-PEG copolymer (Fig. 7.b) are indicated. The photograph shows that the nanoparticles were well accumulated that was because the nano size is about 10nm. After encapsulating and modifying magnetic nanoparticles, the size of the particles changed to 50-70 nm and scatter of the particles was significantly enhanced that using electrostatic repulsion force and a steric barrier between the copolymer chains on the encapsulated nanoparticles is justifiable.


To reduce the mortality rate of lung cancer, the spread of new therapies, early diagnosis and even prevention of this cancer is of particular importance. Common cancer treatments such as radiation therapy and laser therapy, chemotherapy, surgery, etc. have not had a significant change in the prevention of metastases or the treatment of the disease. Chemotherapy, which is the main body of the treatment, uses strong anti-cancer medicines that are transmitted through the bloodstream (20). Eating or injecting these medicines into the bloodstream will disrupt the ability to make new DNA in cancer cells or prevent the complete division of cancer cells. Since these agents cause inhibition of DNA transcription, they also cause many complications in the body’s proliferating cells, such as Hair follicle (hair loss), gonads (infertility), intestines (diarrhea and colitis), bone marrow (cytopenia) etc. There is also the risk of developing cancer from the side effects of these medicines. The use of systems and nanocarriers has been considered for reducing the medicine resistance and side effects of chemotherapy medicines because of the significant difference in the IC50 of these systems(42). Clinical applications of cisplatin encounter with challenges such as a very low solubility in biological environments, extensive side effects and a completely non-selective performance in the face of normal and cancerous cells. Which can be used to overcome this limitation in the form of nanocapsules with biocompatible polymers such as PCL, PEG, PLGA, etc. The combination of cisplatin with Poly Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) polymerase in A549 cell line has been investigated and has shown an increase in the toxicity and anti-cancer effects of the combination and a reduction in the IC50 of the nanocapsulated medicine compared with the pure medicine(43, 44). Our goal in this study was to eliminate the limitations of cisplatin with the use of the intelligent nano-medicine delivery system. In order to better comparison and observation on the effect of nanoparticles on medicine delivery and anti-cancer effects, the A549 cell line was treated with nanocapsulated cisplatin these and pure cisplatin. The MTT assay test showed that the Fe3O4 -PCI-PEG copolymer has no toxic and fatal effects on the cancer cell line and is completely biocompatible. As well as, the comparison of results clearly showed that the toxicity and degradation of nanocapsulated cisplatin compared to pure cisplatin had a remarkable effect and IC50 was significantly reduced at 24, 48 and 72 hours. That way, IC50 for pure cisplatin at 24, 48 and 72 hours, 50, 22 and 8 μg/ml, and for nano-capsulated cisplatin Respectively 15, 8 μg / ml and 2.5 μg/ml was obtained. The results of the study showed that nanocapsulated cisplatin had a significant cytotoxic and anticancer effect on the A549 cell line in-vitro, and it can be concluded from this and previous research(44) that the magnetic copolymer of poly-caprolactone-polyethylene glycol has a forceful toxic effect on lung cancer cells, and this complex can play an important role in treating this cancer. The study showed that Fe3O4 -PCL-PEG nanoparticles can be used as a suitable carrier to the preparation of cisplatin nano-formulation for targeted cancer treatment since there is a good balance between the size and incidence of encapsulation. The loading of cisplatin in Fe3O4 -PCL-PEG nanoparticles improves medicine delivery and it can be concluded from the results that cisplatin in pure and nanocapsulated mode produces cytotoxic effects on the lung cancer cell line, but in nanocapsulated form under similar conditions at low concentrations It has more potent cytotoxic effects, and these effects are dose-related and time-dependent. The results of this study were in line with previous research also the positive effects of nanoparticles on targeted medicine delivery showed that nanoparticles loaded medicine can improve solubility, gradual and continuous release of the medicine, increased medicine delivery and improved anti-cancer effects of the combination.


The authors thank Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Science of Tabriz Medical Sciences University for all supports offered. This work is financed by 2015 Medicine Applied Research Center Tabriz university of Medical Sciences Grant.


The authors reported no declaration of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.



1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2011;61(2):69-90.

2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2017;67(1):7-30.

3. Mackay J, Eriksen M, Eriksen MP. The tobacco atlas: World Health Organization; 2002.

4. Sun S, Schiller JH, Gazdar AF. Lung cancer in never smokers — a different disease. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2007;7(10):778-90.

5. Adami HO, Day NE, Trichopoulos D, Willett WC. Primary and secondary prevention in the reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality. European Journal of Cancer. 2001;37:118-27.

6. Stewart BW, Kleihues P. World cancer report: IARC press Lyon; 2003.

7. Xiao K, Jiang J, Guan C, Dong C, Wang G, Bai L, et al. Curcumin Induces Autophagy via Activating the AMPK Signaling Pathway in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences. 2013;123(2):102-9.

8. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, McGuinness G, Miettinen OS, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. The Lancet. 1999;354(9173):99-105.

9. Bhattacharjee A, Richards WG, Staunton J, Li C, Monti S, Vasa P, et al. Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98(24):13790-5.

10. Zarogoulidis P, Petridis D, Ritzoulis C, Darwiche K, Spyratos D, Huang H, et al. Establishing the optimal nebulization system for paclitaxel, docetaxel, cisplatin, carboplatin and gemcitabine: Back to drawing the residual cup. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2013;453(2):480-7.

11. Journal N-sCLCCGJBBM. Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. 1995:899-909.

12. Fukuoka M, Furuse K, Saijo N, Nishiwaki Y, Ikegami H, Tamura T, et al. Randomized Trial of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Vincristine Versus Cisplatin and Etoposide Versus Alternation of These Regimens in Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1991;83(12):855-61.

13. Holohan C, Van Schaeybroeck S, Longley DB, Johnston PG. Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2013;13(10):714-26.

14. Reck M, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, Ramlau R, Gorbounova V, Hirsh V, et al. Phase III Trial of Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine With Either Placebo or Bevacizumab As First-Line Therapy for Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: AVAiL. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27(8):1227-34.

15. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nature Nanotechnology. 2007;2(12):751-60.

16. Karkan SF, Davaran S, Rahbarghazi R, Salehi R, Akbarzadeh A. Electrospun nanofibers for the fabrication of engineered vascular grafts. Journal of Biological Engineering. 2019;13(1).

17. Gaucher G, Dufresne M-H, Sant VP, Kang N, Maysinger D, Leroux J-C. Block copolymer micelles: preparation, characterization and application in drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2005;109(1-3):169-88.

18. Gaumet M, Vargas A, Gurny R, Delie F. Nanoparticles for drug delivery: The need for precision in reporting particle size parameters. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2008;69(1):1-9.

19. Lu A-H, Salabas EL, Schüth F. Magnetic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Protection, Functionalization, and Application. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2007;46(8):1222-44.

20. Fathi Karkan S, Mohammadhosseini M, Panahi Y, Milani M, Zarghami N, Akbarzadeh A, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles in cancer diagnosis and treatment: a review. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology. 2016;45(1):1-5.

21. Ebrahimnezhad Z, Zarghami N, Keyhani M, Amirsaadat S, Akbarzadeh A, Rahmati M, et al. Retraction Note: Inhibition of hTERT Gene Expression by Silibinin-Loaded PLGA-PEG-Fe₃O₄ in T47D Breast Cancer Cell Line. BioImpacts. 2018;8(4):321-.

22. Rezaei-Sadabady R, Zarghami N, Barzegar A, Eidi A, Akbarzadeh A, Rezaei-Tavirani M. Studies of the Relationship between Structure and Antioxidant Activity in Interesting Systems, Including Tyrosol, Hydroxytyrosol Derivatives Indicated by Quantum Chemical Calculations. Soft. 2013;02(03):13-8.

23. Iyer AK, Khaled G, Fang J, Maeda H. Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting. Drug Discovery Today. 2006;11(17-18):812-8.

24. Torchilin V. Tumor delivery of macromolecular drugs based on the EPR effect. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2011;63(3):131-5.

25. Guo F, Guo D, Zhang W, Yan Q, Yang Y, Hong W, et al. Preparation of curcumin-loaded PCL-PEG-PCL triblock copolymeric nanoparticles by a microchannel technology. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017;99:328-36.

26. Dasari S, Bernard Tchounwou P. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms of action. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2014;740:364-78.

27. Kelland LR, Farrell NP. Platinum-Based Drugs in Cancer Therapy. Humana Press; 2000.

28. Cooley ME, Davis L, Abrahm JJCn. Cisplatin: a clinical review. Part II--Nursing assessment and management of side effects of cisplatin. 1994;17(4):283-93.

29. Zietman AL, Shipley WU, Kaufman DS, Zehr EM, Heney NM, Althausen AF, et al. A phase I/II trial of transurethral surgery combined with concurrent cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and twice daily radiation followed by selective bladder preservation in operable patients with muscle invading bladder cancer. Journal of Urology. 1998;160(5):1673-7.

30. Ngan RKC, Yiu HHY, Lau WH, Yau S, Cheung FY, Chan TM, et al. Combination gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of a phase II study. Annals of Oncology. 2002;13(8):1252-8.

31. Wolinsky JB, Colson YL, Grinstaff MW. Local drug delivery strategies for cancer treatment: Gels, nanoparticles, polymeric films, rods, and wafers. Journal of Controlled Release. 2012;159(1):14-26.

32. Boulikas T. Clinical overview on Lipoplatin™: a successful liposomal formulation of cisplatin. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 2009;18(8):1197-218.

33. Plummer R, Wilson RH, Calvert H, Boddy AV, Griffin M, Sludden J, et al. A Phase I clinical study of cisplatin-incorporated polymeric micelles (NC-6004) in patients with solid tumours. British Journal of Cancer. 2011;104(4):593-8.

34. Ampollini L, Sonvico F, Barocelli E, Cavazzoni A, Bilancia R, Mucchino C, et al. Intrapleural polymeric films containing cisplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma in a rat tumour model: a preliminary study. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2010;37(3):557-65.

35. Lardinois D, Jung FJ, Opitz I, Rentsch K, Latkoczy C, Vuong V, et al. Intrapleural topical application of cisplatin with the surgical carrier Vivostat increases the local drug concentration in an immune-competent rat model with malignant pleuromesothelioma. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2006;131(3):697-703.e3.

36. Ning S, Yu N, Brown DM, Kanekal S, Knox SJ. Radiosensitization by intratumoral administration of cisplatin in a sustained-release drug delivery system. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 1999;50(2):215-23.

37. Kedar E, Palgi O, Golod G, Babai I, Barenholz Y. Delivery of Cytokines by Liposomes. III. Liposome- Encapsulated GM-CSF and TNF-?? Show Improved Pharmacokinetics and Biological Activity and Reduced Toxicity in Mice. Journal of Immunotherapy. 1997;20(3):180-1.

38. Najmeh Feizi Langaroudi N, Motakef Kazemi NJNRJ. Preparation and characterization of O/W nanoemulsion with Mint essential oil and Parsley aqueous extract and the presence effect of chitosan. 2019;4(1):48-55.

39. Longmire M, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats. Nanomedicine. 2008;3(5):703-17.

40. Mohapatra M, Anand S. Synthesis and applications of nano-structured iron oxides/hydroxides – a review. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology. 2011;2(8).

41. Feng R, Song Z, Zhai G. Preparation and in vivo pharmacokinetics of curcumin-loaded PCL-PEG-PCL triblock copolymeric nanoparticles. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2012:4089.

42. Singh R, Lillard JW. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. 2009;86(3):215-23.

43. He Z, Huang J, Xu Y, Zhang X, Teng Y, Huang C, et al. Co-delivery of cisplatin and paclitaxel by folic acid conjugated amphiphilic PEG-PLGA copolymer nanoparticles for the treatment of non-small lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(39).

44. Nejati-Koshki K, Mesgari M, Ebrahimi E, Abbasalizadeh F, Fekri Aval S, Khandaghi AA, et al. Synthesis andin vitrostudy of cisplatin-loaded Fe3O4nanoparticles modified with PLGA-PEG6000copolymers in treatment of lung cancer. Journal of Microencapsulation. 2014;31(8):815-23.